where content, technology and people meet. (SM) Publishing and content technology executives use Shore to measure and understand their markets and competitors, define marketing strategies and implement successful content products and services using Shore's highly actionable insights into vendors, institutions, individuals and virtual communities.
ContentBlogger is the 2007 SIIA CODiE Award Winner for Best Media Blog
COMMENTARY:

Insights and headlines from Shore analysts on trends in enterprise and media content markets.
  Subscribe to our feed (?) or add to: MyYahoo  iGoogle/Google Reader  Bloglines  NewsGator  Rojo
Monday, January 10, 2005
It must be news, Reuters ran a story about a Business Week cover story about the New York Times, titled The Future of the New York Times. The Reuters article focuses on the theme of free versus fee for online newspapers, even though the Business Week article covers much more territory. Reuters quotes a newspaper industry consultant, John Morton, as saying that free editions of newspapers on the Web are "quickly falling out of favor" and goes further to say that the Wall St. Journal's model of selling paid subscriptions to both print and online editions have "been very successful".

My goodness, I thought we had got beyond pointing to the Wall St. Journal as the paid subscription success story for other newspapers to follow. With flat subscription levels, the Wall St. Journal is busy creating new revenue streams from vertical editions and other advertising and subscription vehicles. The New York Times, with a broader base of online readers (18.5 million unique monthly visitors vs. 701,000 paid subscribers to the WSJ Online)has abundant opportunities to create advertising vehicles that are targeted to segments of its readers. Part of the problem for the New York Times is their dual role as a regional as well as a national newspapers. But, the answer is not to wall off the content and make it available on a subsription-only basis. They'll turn away too much advertising revenue and lose too many occasional or cost-conscious readers. Rather, the folks at the New York Times have to start thinking about how to create new supplemental online editions, ebooks, traditional books, and other content collections that build on their reputation for quality journalism and can be positioned for distinct audiences. The choice to charge a subscription fee, onetime charge, or have complete ad-supported content should depend on the nature of the content and whether its appeal is broad or exclusive. If the content appeals to a broad audience and sufficient advertising support can be found, then it makes sense to use an open access model. If the content is specialized and appeals to a limited market, then a subscription model or mixed subscription/advertising model makes sense. The bottom line is that a publishing organization that has the journalistic resources and content repository depth of the New York Times should be able to publish a host of products that appeal to a variety of target audiences on any technical platform appropriate for that audience.

By Janice - posted at 1:28 PM
permanent link to this entry        bookmark this entry:  AddThis Social Bookmark Tool
  0 comments (click to view or to add your own) 
Comments:  Post a Comment
 

To top of page To Top of Page

COMMENTARY: INDEX
CONTENTBLOGGER
INDUSTRY EVENTS
CONTENT NATION

Read ShoreLines, our free weekly email newsletter.

Sample issue
Follow us on Twitter
Get headline-only feed
Buzz news comments
RECENT ENTRIES
READ CONTENT NATION

Learn how to thrive and to survive as social media changes our work, our lives and our future.
Buy the book
Read it online
Read our social media blog
WEBLOGS: ARCHIVES
 
 

shorename.gif (1190 bytes)
[HOME] [US] [SERVICES] [COMMENTARY] [RESEARCH] [EVENTS] [PRESS] [CONTACT]
Copyright © 1997-2009 Shore Communications Inc.  All Rights Reserved - Click Here to Read Terms of Use
Corporate Privacy Policy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?