where content, technology and people meet. (SM) Publishing and content technology executives use Shore to measure and understand their markets and competitors, define marketing strategies and implement successful content products and services using Shore's highly actionable insights into vendors, institutions, individuals and virtual communities.
ContentBlogger is the 2007 SIIA CODiE Award Winner for Best Media Blog
COMMENTARY:

Insights and headlines from Shore analysts on trends in enterprise and media content markets.
  Subscribe to our feed (?) or add to: MyYahoo  iGoogle/Google Reader  Bloglines  NewsGator  Rojo
Friday, September 16, 2005
As we mentioned in our report on The New Aggregation, the current mania that publishers have for workflow applications has practical limits. Everything in technology can be commoditized easily in time - including the ability to support sophisticated workflows. As PC World notes the new Windows Workflow Foundation (part of the WinFX development environment) suite announced for next year's debut of Microsoft's Windows Vista operating system is an interesting point. The promise of WWF is to simplify vastly the process of developing, testing and maintaining workflow applications, aiming to push out third parties such as portal providers, content management systems and content aggregators that are gobbling up the high-end of software value in today's institutions. In a sense Microsoft is saying that workflows themselves are becoming more content than software, units of information and experiences to be consumed within a proprietary venue - WinFX.

While Microsoft's plans are not likely to crack the 20 percent of high-end users who can extract more value from their current vendors their typical hope of appealing to the 80 percent who are willing to find cheaper solutions that they can tweak themselves is likely to find both content vendors and solutions providers willing to cater to small-to-medium sized businesses and departments that can afford to get "pretty good" workflow infrastructure to do the job. But at the other end of the spectrum are emerging "platformless" solutions such as Salesforce.com, which treat both content and functionality as discrete modules that can be added to a browser-based application with no software development required by the customer. As indicated in last week's weblog, this approach has increasing appeal to major business content producers such as OneSource that have been spearheading integrations into portals via Web services interfaces for some time. These approaches to workflow integration that take the software out of the clients' hands altogether are likely to gain in popularity where they contain the right amount of configurability and administrative ease. Content producers and aggregators should look at WWF as a far more sophisticated approach to true workflow integration than that provided via the crude Research task pane capabilities found in today's Office applications, but focus more broadly on a wide variety of XML-based objects with embedded content and functionality that can work in many different portal environments effectively.

By John Blossom - posted at 3:40 PM
permanent link to this entry        bookmark this entry:  AddThis Social Bookmark Tool
  0 comments (click to view or to add your own) 
Comments:  Post a Comment
 

To top of page To Top of Page

COMMENTARY: INDEX
CONTENTBLOGGER
INDUSTRY EVENTS
CONTENT NATION

Read ShoreLines, our free weekly email newsletter.

Sample issue
Follow us on Twitter
Get headline-only feed
Buzz news comments
RECENT ENTRIES
READ CONTENT NATION

Learn how to thrive and to survive as social media changes our work, our lives and our future.
Buy the book
Read it online
Read our social media blog
WEBLOGS: ARCHIVES
 
 

shorename.gif (1190 bytes)
[HOME] [US] [SERVICES] [COMMENTARY] [RESEARCH] [EVENTS] [PRESS] [CONTACT]
Copyright © 1997-2009 Shore Communications Inc.  All Rights Reserved - Click Here to Read Terms of Use
Corporate Privacy Policy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?